浅谈委中穴与承山穴针刺深度的临床应用

李志道教授经过50余年临床实践研究,结合解剖学相关知识,发现委中、承山二穴在针刺深度与传统认识有所不同。其中,委中穴在刺入0. 5~0. 8寸,承山穴在刺入2. 0~3. 0寸时最易达到循经得气的效果,通过调整针尖方向还可较准确达到气至病所的效果,且针感与相应神经分布区域相吻合。该针感在某些疾病,尤其神经压迫相关症状的治疗中疗效明显,且优于传统教材所述针刺深度。     

综合疗法治疗4~5期慢性肾脏病31例临床观察

目的:观察综合疗法治疗慢性肾脏病(CKD)4~5期脾肾亏虚证的效果。方法:将CKD4~5期脾肾亏虚证患者62例随机分为2组,其中治疗组31例,对照组30例(剔除1例)。对照组予基础治疗合中药、骨化三醇及碳酸钙D3片治疗,治疗组予基础治疗合中药、骨化三醇及益肾泄浊汤保留灌肠治疗,观察时间为4周。比较2组血肌酐(Scr)、肾小球滤过率(e GFR)、尿素氮(BUN)、血钙、血磷、碱性磷酸酶(ALP)、甲状旁腺激素(i PTH)及中医证候疗效。结果:中医证候总有效率治疗组为83.87%(26/31),对照组为73.33%(22/30),组间比较,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05);2组Scr、e GFR、BUN、血磷治疗前后组内比较及治疗后组间比较,差异均有统计学意义(P<0.01或P<0.05);2组血钙、i PTH、ALP治疗前后组内比较,差异均有统计学意义(P<0.01),但治疗后组间比较,差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。结论:综合疗法治疗慢性肾脏病4~5期脾肾亏虚证效果确切,安全可靠。     

肝癌患者行肝动脉化疗栓塞术前营养风险筛查的应用研究

目的 探讨肝癌患者行肝动脉化疗栓塞术前营养风险筛查的应用及对手术疗效、生活质量和生存预后的影响。方法 选取2013年1月至2018年12月首都医科大学附属北京世纪坛医院介入治疗科收治的行肝动脉化疗栓塞术治疗的中晚期肝癌患者180例，根据营养风险筛查2002（NRS 2002）将研究人群分为有营养风险组（NRS 2002≥3分）和无营养风险组（NRS 2002<3分），比较两组患者的临床基线特征、反映营养状况的物理和生化指标以及行肝动脉化疗栓塞术（TACE）手术疗效及并发症和生活质量评分，采用Kaplan-Meier方法对两组患者进行生存分析，比较上消化道出血、肝性脑病等临床终点事件的发生率。结果 纳入标准的180例患者中，无营养风险患者有85例，有营养风险患者有95例，营养风险发生率52.8%。两组患者的肱三头肌皮褶厚度、上臂肌围、体质指数、白蛋白之间存在统计学差异（P<0.05）；两组患者的总蛋白和前蛋白之间没有显著的统计学差异（P>0.05）。两组患者的TACE治疗肿瘤的临床有效率和术后并发症没有显著的差异（P>0.05）。无营养风险患者生活质量评分比有营养风险患者评分高（P<0.05）。有营养风险患者3年生存率为54.74%；无营养风险患者3年生存率为68.24%，存在统计学意义（HR=0.61，P=0.05， 95%CI=0.38~0.98）。肝性脑病、低蛋白血症和贫血的发生率两组之间有统计学差异（P<0.05）。上消化道出血和门脉癌栓堵塞的发生率之间没有统计学差异（P>0.05）。结论 营养风险筛查对于行TACE手术患者具有重要意义，营养风险与临床结局密切相关。     

Evolving Radiotherapy Techniques in Paediatric Oncology

Aims

Childhood cancer is rare and survival of childhood cancer has increased up to 80% at 5 years after diagnosis. Radiotherapy is an important element of the multimodal treatment concept. However, due to growing tissue, children are particularly sensitive to radiation-related side-effects and the induction of secondary malignancies. However, radiotherapy techniques have continuously progressed. In addition, modern treatment concepts have been improved in order to minimise long-term effects. Today, radiotherapy is used for various tumour types in childhood, such as sarcomas and tumours of the central nervous system.

Treating acute myeloid leukemia in the modern era: A primer

Recent years have seen tremendous advances in treating acute myeloid leukemia (AML), largely because of progress in understanding the genetic basis of the disease. The US Food and Drug Administration approved 7 agents for AML in the last 2 years: the first new drugs in decades. In this review, the authors discuss these new approvals in the backdrop of an overall strategy for treating AML today. Treating AML in the modern era requires: 1) access to and use of upfront genetic and cytogenetic testing, not only to describe prognosis but also to help identify the best available therapy; 2) effectively working new therapies into a conventional backbone of treatment, including transplantation; and 3) continued commitment to clinical trials designed to capitalize on advances in genetics and immunology to foster the next wave of drug approvals.     

Biperiden and mepazine effectively inhibit MALT1 activity and tumor growth in pancreatic cancer

MALT1 is a key mediator of NF-κB signaling and a main driver of B-cell lymphomas. Remarkably, MALT1 is expressed in the majority of pancreatic ductal adenocarcinomas (PDACs) as well, but absent from normal exocrine pancreatic tissue. Following, MALT1 shows off to be a specific target in cancer cells of PDAC without affecting regular pancreatic cells. Therefore, we studied the impact of pharmacological MALT1 inhibition in pancreatic cancer and showed promising effects on tumor progression. Mepazine (Mep), a phenothiazine derivative, is a known potent MALT1 inhibitor. Newly, we described that biperiden (Bip) is a potent MALT1 inhibitor with even less pharmacological side effects. Thus, Bip is a promising drug leading to reduced proliferation and increased apoptosis in PDAC cells in vitro and in vivo. By compromising MALT1 activity, nuclear translocation of c-Rel is prevented. c-Rel is critical for NF-κB-dependent inhibition of apoptosis. Hence, off-label use of Bip or Mep represents a promising new therapeutic approach to PDAC treatment. Regularly, the Anticholinergicum Bip is used to treat neurological side effects of Phenothiazines, like extrapyramidal symptoms.     

激素受体阳性乳腺癌患者在不同内分泌治疗用药时间的类更年期症状及生命质量

目的探讨激素受体阳性(HR+)乳腺癌患者在不同内分泌治疗时间的类更年期症状和生命质量状况。方法采用横断面研究设计,收集2011—2017年就诊于四川省肿瘤医院经病理确诊的167例HR+乳腺癌患者,按内分泌治疗时间分为<12个月组、12~36个月组、>36个月组。应用改良Kupperman量表和乳腺癌生命质量测定量表(FACT-B)测量类更年期症状和生命质量。采用方差分析及χ2检验比较不同用药时间及用药类型患者的类更年期症状差异,采用协方差分析和多重线性回归分析不同用药时间患者的生命质量得分差异和类更年期症状对生命质量的影响。结果167例乳腺癌患者的类更年期症状得分为(14.5±7.6)分,现患率为87.4%(146/167),以失眠率最高(73.7%,123/167)。除失眠易激动外,选择性雌激素受体调节剂(SERM)使用者以潮热症状最多(64.8%,79/122),芳香化酶抑制剂使用者以骨关节痛症状最多(62.2%,28/45)。患者的FACT-B总得分为(104.5±15.5)分,达标率高达89.8%(150/167),但各维度状况参差不齐,以社会家庭及功能维度达标率最低,分别为73.0%(122/167)和50.9%(85/167)。<12个月组、12~36个月组和>36个月组患者的Kupperman总分分别为(15.0±1.3)分、(14.0±6.9)分和(14.5±7.4)分;FACT-B总得分分别为(102.7±17.8)分、(105.0±12.9)分和(105.6±16.7)分,差异均无统计学意义(均P>0.05)。多重线性回归分析结果显示,患者服用SERM类药物期间类更年期症状对生命质量存在负向影响,<12个月组、12~36个月组和>36个月组患者的标准偏回归系数分别为-0.67、-0.30和-0.50,影响程度在12~36个月组中最小。结论HR+乳腺癌患者回归社会、家庭和功能恢复情况较差,应重点关注。类更年期症状在内分泌治疗期间普遍存在,应积极处理以改善生命质量。     

Real world outcomes with Bortezomib Thalidomide dexamethasone and Cyclophosphamide Bortezomib dexamethasone induction treatment for transplant eligible multiple myeloma patients in a Latin American country. A Retrospective Cohort Study from Grupo Argentino de Mieloma Múltiple

Data about treatment outcomes and toxicity in Latin America are scarce. There are differences with central countries based on access to healthcare system and socioeconomic status. Argentinean Society of Hematology recommends bortezomib-based triplets for induction treatment of transplant eligible newly diagnosed multiple myeloma patients. Most common options are CyBorD (cyclophosphamide, bortezomib and dexamethasone) and VTD (bortezomib, thalidomide and dexamethasone). Main goal of our retrospective, multicentric study was to compare very good partial response rate (VGPR) or better after induction treatment in a real-world setting in Argentina. Secondary objectives included comparison of complete response (CR) post-induction and after bone marrow transplantation, grade 3-4 adverse events (AEs), progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS). Three hundred twenty-two patients were included (median age at diagnosis: 57 years; 52% male; 28% had ISS3; 14% with high-risk cytogenetics; median follow up: 34 months). CyBorD was indicated in 74% and 26% received VTD. In VTD arm, 72.62% of patients achieved at least VGPR vs 53.36% receiving CyBorD (odds ratio, OR: 1.96 [95% confidence interval, CI: 1.08-3.57; P = .026] after adjusting by age, ISS [International Staging System], lactate dehydrogenase levels (LDH) and cytogenetic risk. Difference in VGPR was 19.26% (95% CI: 15-24). CR rate were 35.92% (VTD) vs 22.55% (CyBorD) (adjusted OR: 2.13 [95% CI: 1.12-4.05]). Difference in CR was 13.37% (95% CI: 9.6-17.53). Adverse events (AEs) were more common with VTD (69.05% vs 55.46% for CyBorD; P = .030), especially grade 3-4 neuropathy (P = .005) and thrombosis (P = .001). Thromboprophylaxis was inadequate in 20.24% of patients. Hematological AEs were more common with CyBorD, especially thrombocytopenia (P = .017). PFS and OS at 24 months were not different between treatments. In this real-world setting, VTD was associated with better CR and VGPR than CyBorD. Nevertheless, CyBorD continues to be the preferred induction regimen in Argentina, based on safety profile. Frontline autologous stem cell transplantation improves quality of responses, especially in countries with limited access to new drugs.     

luminal型乳腺癌患者戈舍瑞林用药依从性现状及影响因素分析

目的了解luminal型乳腺癌患者戈舍瑞林用药依从性情况，分析影响其依从性的相关因素。 方法根据纳入及排除标准，收集2015年1月至2017年12月重庆医科大学附属第一医院内分泌乳腺外科使用戈舍瑞林治疗的luminal型乳腺癌女性患者174例进行回顾性分析。中位随访时间16个月(范围：1～54个月)，完成随访154例，失访20例，失访率为11.5%(20/174)。采用问卷调查评价其用药依从性，使用χ²检验和Mann-Whitney U检验比较不同特征患者依从性的差异；用Logistic回归分析影响患者依从性的相关因素。将患者分为≤40岁(103例)和>40岁(51例)2个亚组，进行亚组分析。 结果在完成随访的154例患者中，依从性好82例(53.2%，82/154)，依从性差72例(46.8%，72/154)。≤40岁组患者中，55.3%(57/103)依从性好，而>40岁组患者中仅49.0%(25/51)依从性好。全部患者中，文化程度、医保类型、不良反应和是否了解疗程时间均与乳腺癌患者戈舍瑞林用药依从性有关(χ²＝13.586、13.042、7.880、14.251，P均<0.050)；Logistic回归分析结果显示：高中及以下学历、居民医保和不了解戈舍瑞林的疗程时间为影响依从性的危险因素(OR＝2.772，95%CI：1.243～6.183，P＝0.013；OR＝5.188，95%CI：1.383～19.465，P＝0.015; OR＝3.363，95%CI：1.645～6.878，P＝0.001)。亚组分析显示：文化程度、职业、医保类型和是否了解疗程时间是≤40岁患者戈舍瑞林用药依从性的影响因素(χ²＝15.992、5.978、7.701、10.376，P均<0.050)；不良反应及医保类型是>40岁患者用药依从性的影响因素(χ²＝4.763、7.471，P均<0.050)。Logistic回归分析表明：高中及以下文化程度和不了解疗程时间是≤40岁患者用药依从性的危险因素(OR＝5.126，95%CI：2.086～12.598，P<0.001; OR＝3.631, 95%CI：1.500～8.792，P＝0.004)；居民医保是>40岁患者用药依从性的危险因素(OR＝64.315，95%CI：2.513～1 646.042，P＝0.012)，不良反应是>40岁患者用药依从性的保护因素OR＝0.189，95%CI＝0.047～0.759，P＝0.019)。 结论luminal型乳腺癌患者戈舍瑞林用药依从性较差，文化程度、医保类型及是否了解疗程时间都可能影响患者的依从性。≤40岁组和>40岁组患者依从性有差异，且影响因素不同，建议对不同年龄患者用药采用不同的干预措施。